"We don't accept Section 8" used to be a common line in California rental listings. Since 2020, it's also been an illegal one. State law now treats a tenant's source of income — including housing vouchers — as a protected class, on the same legal footing as protections based on race, religion, or disability. For small landlords who've never worked with the voucher program before, this changes both what you can advertise and how you have to evaluate an application.
The Law: SB 329 and SB 222
Effective January 1, 2020, SB 329 amended the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12955) to expand the definition of "source of income" to explicitly include federal, state, and local housing subsidies — including Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. A companion law, SB 222, added HUD-VASH vouchers (for veterans) to the same protection and added military and veteran status as separately protected classes.
Before SB 329, some California courts had interpreted "source of income" narrowly enough to exclude voucher payments, on the theory that the subsidy portion is paid to the landlord rather than to the tenant directly. SB 329 closed that gap explicitly — the law now defines source of income to include "lawful, verifiable income paid directly to a tenant... or paid to a housing owner or landlord on behalf of a tenant," which unambiguously covers voucher programs.
What "Source of Income" Covers
The protected category is broad. It includes:
- Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance
- HUD-VASH vouchers for veterans
- Other federal, state, or local public assistance
- Rental assistance, homeless assistance, security deposit assistance, or rapid rehousing program funds
This applies to essentially anyone renting residential property in California — landlords, property managers, leasing agents, and HOAs alike.
What This Actually Prohibits
Source of income discrimination isn't limited to an outright refusal to rent. Common forms that create liability include:
- Refusing to rent to, or refusing to renew, an applicant because they hold a voucher
- Advertising a preference against voucher holders — including on listing sites like Craigslist or Zillow
- Requiring a higher income multiple applied to the tenant's actual rent share, rather than the total rent (including the subsidized portion), when evaluating a voucher holder's ability to pay
- Slow-walking or refusing to complete required program paperwork
- Falsely claiming the unit isn't "registered" for the voucher program
- Raising rent specifically after learning a household holds a voucher
Many of these are subtle enough that a landlord may not realize they're violating the law — "the paperwork takes too long, so we just don't do it" is a common example that still counts as discrimination in practice, even without any stated intent to discriminate.
The Credit History Limit (SB 267)
A more recent addition, SB 267, effective January 1, 2024, restricts how you can use credit history specifically against Section 8 applicants. You cannot rely on a voucher holder's credit history as part of your screening decision unless you also offer them the option to provide alternative, lawful, verifiable evidence of their ability to pay their portion of the rent — things like government benefit statements, pay records, or bank statements. If you do offer that alternative, you're also required to give the applicant additional time to provide it.
You Can Still Apply Your Other Standard Criteria
Accepting vouchers doesn't mean lowering your standards across the board. SB 329 doesn't prevent you from applying your normal screening requirements — rental history, non-financial background checks, and reasonable qualification standards — to voucher applicants the same way you would to any other applicant. What it prohibits is treating the source of a qualifying applicant's income as a disqualifying factor on its own.
Considering opening up your units to voucher tenants? LeaseConnectPro's onboarding wizard and lease templates work the same way regardless of an applicant's income source, so bringing a voucher tenant into your portfolio doesn't require a separate process. Download the app →
Local Ordinances Can Go Further
Even before SB 329, cities and counties including Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Santa Monica, Berkeley, and several others already had their own local source-of-income ordinances. SB 329 set a statewide floor — it didn't preempt these local rules, some of which impose additional procedural requirements. If your property is in one of these jurisdictions, check whether local rules add anything beyond the state law.
What's at Stake for Getting This Wrong
SB 329 leaves enforcement to the courts and to administrative fair housing agencies rather than setting a fixed statutory penalty, but source-of-income discrimination is actively tested by tenant advocacy groups in California, and complaints can result in damages, civil penalties, and attorney's fees through the same channels as other fair housing violations.
Making the Process Consistent
Download LeaseConnectPro on the App Store →
Download LeaseConnectPro on Google Play →
Get started free and apply the same lease, screening, and rent-tracking process to every applicant — voucher or not — without building a separate workflow by hand.
This article is for general informational purposes and isn't legal advice. Fair housing compliance can involve overlapping federal, state, and local rules — confirm your specific obligations with a licensed attorney.